UPSC CSE Prelims
Modern History Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Solved Previous Year Questions (PYQs) for Modern History in UPSC CSE Prelims in English & Hindi Medium.
Chapter Breakdown: Scroll →
With reference to the Government of India Act, 1935, consider the following statements:
- It provided for the establishment of an All India Federation based on the union of the British Indian Provinces and Princely States.
- Defence and Foreign Affairs were kept under the control of the federal legislature.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Correct Answer: ✅ 1 Only (Option A)
The Government of India Act, 1935 was the most comprehensive constitutional reform introduced by the British before independence. It proposed an All-India Federation but kept crucial subjects under British control.
✅ Statement I is Correct: The Act provided for an All India Federation consisting of British Indian Provinces and Princely States. However, the federation never came into existence because enough princely states did not join.
❌ Statement II is Incorrect: Defence and Foreign Affairs were reserved subjects under the control of the Governor-General, not the federal legislature. This ensured continued British control over key areas.
Short Notes: Government of India Act, 1935
-
It was the longest Act passed by the British Parliament for India.
-
Proposed an All India Federation of Provinces and Princely States.
-
Introduced Provincial Autonomy, ending dyarchy in provinces.
-
Introduced Dyarchy at the Centre, though it was never implemented.
-
Created the Federal Court of India in 1937.
-
Divided powers into Federal, Provincial, and Concurrent Lists.
-
Extended the principle of separate electorates.
-
Many provisions of the Act influenced the Constitution of India (1950).
Consider the following statements :
Statement-I: 7th August is declared as the National Handloom Day.
Statement-II: It was in 1905 that the Swadeshi Movement was launched on the same day.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
National Handloom Day is observed annually on 7th August to honour handloom weavers and highlight India's handloom industry. The date was specifically chosen to commemorate the launch of the Swadeshi Movement on 7th August 1905 at Calcutta Town Hall, which aimed at reviving domestic products and production processes in protest against the partition of Bengal.
✅ Statement-I – Correct: 7th August is declared as the National Handloom Day, first observed in 2015.
✅ Statement-II – Correct: The Swadeshi Movement was launched on 7th August 1905 at Calcutta Town Hall.
Since the date of National Handloom Day was deliberately chosen to commemorate the Swadeshi Movement's launch, Statement-II correctly explains Statement-I.
📝 Short Notes: Swadeshi Movement (1905-1908)
- Launch Date: 7th August 1905 at Calcutta Town Hall in response to the Partition of Bengal announced by Lord Curzon
- Objective: Boycott of British goods and promotion of Indian-made products (Swadeshi goods) as a form of economic nationalism
- Key Features: Boycott of foreign goods, promotion of indigenous industries (especially handloom textiles), establishment of Swadeshi stores, and mass participation
- Leaders: Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bipin Chandra Pal, Aurobindo Ghosh
- Methods: Public meetings, processions, formation of Swadeshi Samitis, use of Swadeshi or indigenous goods, and establishment of national educational institutions
- Impact: First mass movement involving various sections of society; laid foundation for future mass movements and promoted indigenous industries, particularly handlooms
- National Handloom Day: Instituted by Government of India in 2015, celebrated on 7th August to honor the contribution of handloom weavers and the Swadeshi spirit
With reference to the Indian History, Alexander Rea, A. H. Longhurst, Robert Sewell, James Burgess and Walter Elliot were associated with
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — Archaeological excavations
All five individuals mentioned—Alexander Rea, A. H. Longhurst, Robert Sewell, James Burgess, and Walter Elliot—were prominent archaeologists and researchers who contributed significantly to archaeological excavations and documentation in colonial India, particularly in South India. They were instrumental in discovering and preserving Buddhist and ancient Indian heritage sites such as Amaravati, Nagarjunakonda, and Pallavaram.
📝 Short Notes: British Archaeologists in Colonial India
| Archaeologist | Period | Major Contributions |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rea | 1858-1924 | Worked mainly in South India; unearthed a sarcophagus from Pallavaram hillocks in Tamil Nadu |
| A. H. Longhurst | 1876-1955 | Archaeologist and art historian; directed systematic excavations at Nagarjunakonda (1927-1931) |
| Robert Sewell | 1845-1925 | Civil servant in Madras Presidency; conducted archaeological work at Amaravati Buddhist stupa |
| James Burgess | 1832-1916 | Founded Indian Antiquary (1872); served as Director General, Archaeological Survey of India (1886-89) |
| Walter Elliot | 1803-1887 | Visited Amaravati site (1854); collected sculpture panels crucial for understanding South Indian Buddhist art |
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
By which one of the following Acts was the Governor General of Bengal designated as the Governor General of India?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — The Charter Act of 1833
The Charter Act of 1833 was a landmark legislation that centralized administrative control in British India. It redesignated the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India, granting him authority over the entire British territorial possessions in India with unified civil and military powers. Lord William Bentinck became the first Governor-General of India under this Act, which also stripped the Governors of Bombay and Madras of their legislative powers, vesting exclusive legislative authority for all of British India in the Governor-General.
📝 Short Notes: Charter Acts and Constitutional Developments
| Act | Year | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
| Regulating Act | 1773 | Created Governor-General of Bengal (Warren Hastings); established Supreme Court at Calcutta |
| Pitt's India Act | 1784 | Established dual government system; created Board of Control |
| Charter Act | 1793 | Extended Company's trade monopoly for 20 years; increased salaries of Board of Control members |
| Charter Act | 1813 | Ended Company's trade monopoly except tea and China trade; promoted education |
| Charter Act | 1833 | Governor-General of Bengal became Governor-General of India; ended commercial functions of Company; opened civil services to Indians |
| Charter Act | 1853 | Separated legislative and executive functions; introduced competitive examination for civil services |
With reference to Indian history, consider the following statements:
- The Dutch established their factories/werehouses on the east coast on lands granted to them by Gajapati rulers.
- Alfonso de Albuquerque captured Goa from the Bijapur Sultanate.
- The English East India Company established a factory at Madras on a plot of land leased from a representative of the Vijayanagara empire.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — 2 and 3 only
This question tests knowledge of European trading companies' establishment in India during the medieval and early modern period. Statements 2 and 3 are historically accurate, while Statement 1 contains a chronological impossibility.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The Dutch East India Company (VOC) was formed in 1602, while the Gajapati dynasty of Odisha had already declined by 1541. The Dutch acquired land grants from other rulers like the Golconda Sultanate and local Nayakas, not from Gajapati rulers.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Alfonso de Albuquerque captured Goa in 1510 from Yusuf Adil Shah of the Bijapur Sultanate, establishing Portuguese dominance in the region for over 450 years.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: In 1639, Francis Day obtained a lease for land in Madras (Madraspatnam) from Damarla Venkatapathy Nayaka of Chandragiri, who was a representative of the declining Vijayanagara Empire. Fort St. George was subsequently built here.
📝 Short Notes: European Trading Companies in India
| Company/Power | Year of Establishment | Key Settlements | Grants/Territory From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portuguese | First to arrive (1498) | Goa (1510), Daman, Diu | Goa captured from Bijapur Sultanate |
| Dutch (VOC) | 1602 | Pulicat, Nagapattinam, Cochin | Golconda Sultanate, local Nayakas |
| English (EIC) | 1600 | Madras (1639), Bombay (1668), Calcutta (1690) | Chandragiri Nayaka, Portuguese, Bengal Nawab |
| French | 1664 | Pondicherry (1674), Chandannagar | Bijapur, Bengal rulers |
| Danish | 1616 | Tranquebar (1620), Serampore | Nayaka of Thanjavur |
- Gajapati Dynasty: Ruled Odisha and parts of Andhra Pradesh; declined by mid-16th century (last ruler Kakharua Deva, 1541).
- Vijayanagara Empire: After the Battle of Talikota (1565), fragmented into Nayaka kingdoms including Chandragiri, Madurai, and Thanjavur.
- Alfonso de Albuquerque: Portuguese Governor in India (1509-1515); strategic mastermind who captured Goa, Malacca, and Hormuz.
In the Government of India Act 1919, the functions of Provincial Government were divided into “Reserved” and “Transferred” subjects. Which of the following were treated as “Reserved” subjects?
- Administration of Justice
- Local Self-Government
- Land Revenue
- Police
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — 1, 3 and 4
The Government of India Act 1919 introduced the system of Dyarchy in the provinces, dividing subjects into 'Reserved' (controlled by the Governor and Executive Council) and 'Transferred' (administered by Indian ministers). Reserved subjects were considered more crucial and included Administration of Justice, Land Revenue, and Police, while Local Self-Government was a Transferred subject.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Administration of Justice was a Reserved subject under the control of the Governor.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: Local Self-Government was a Transferred subject, administered by Indian ministers.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: Land Revenue was a Reserved subject, being a critical financial matter.
✅ Statement 4 – Correct: Police was a Reserved subject, dealing with law and order.
📝 Short Notes: Dyarchy under Government of India Act 1919
| Category | Reserved Subjects | Transferred Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Governor with Executive Council (British bureaucrats) | Governor with Indian Ministers (elected) |
| Nature | Crucial/sensitive matters | Less critical/nation-building activities |
| Examples | Law and order, Police, Justice, Land Revenue, Irrigation, Finance | Education, Public Health, Local Self-Government, Public Works, Agriculture, Excise |
| Ministers' Responsibility | Executive Council not responsible to legislature | Indian ministers responsible to provincial legislature |
| Purpose | Retain British control over key areas | Gradual Indian participation in governance |
- Dyarchy literally means 'dual government' - introduced as part of Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919)
- System criticized by Indian leaders as it created division of authority and was unworkable in practice
- Abolished by the Government of India Act 1935, which introduced provincial autonomy
With reference to the proposals of Cripps Mission, consider the following statements:
- The Constituent Assembly would have members nominated by the Provincial Assemblies as well as the Princely States.
- Any Province, which is not prepared to accept the new Constitution, would have the right to sign a separate agreement with Britain regarding its future status.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — 2 only
The Cripps Mission (1942) proposed constitutional arrangements that included provisions for provinces unwilling to accept the new constitution. Statement 2 is correct as it accurately reflects this proposal, while Statement 1 contains a subtle but critical error regarding the composition of the Constituent Assembly.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The Cripps Mission proposed that Constituent Assembly members would be elected by Provincial Assemblies, but nominated by the rulers in case of Princely States. The statement uses "nominated by" for both, which is factually incorrect for Provincial Assemblies.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: The mission explicitly allowed provinces that did not accept the new constitution to have the right to sign separate agreements with Britain regarding their future status, giving them an opt-out provision.
📝 Short Notes: Cripps Mission (1942)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Background | Sent by British PM Winston Churchill in March 1942, led by Sir Stafford Cripps, to secure Indian cooperation during World War II |
| Main Proposals | • Dominion status for India after the war • Constitution-making body with members elected by Provincial Assemblies and nominated by Princely State rulers • Provinces could opt out and form separate unions • British control over defense during the war |
| Why Rejected | • Congress wanted immediate transfer of power, not post-war promises • Muslim League objected to grouping formula • No real transfer of power during the war • Provision for partition implicit in opt-out clause |
| Gandhi's Remark | Called it a "post-dated cheque on a crashing bank" |
| Significance | First British acceptance of India's right to independence; recognized Princely States' importance; accepted principle of partition |
Consider the following freedom fighters:
- Barindra Kumar Ghosh
- Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee
- Rash Behari Bose
Who of the above was/were actively associated with the Ghadar Party?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — 3 only
Among the given freedom fighters, only Rash Behari Bose was actively associated with the Ghadar Party. He played a crucial role in coordinating the Ghadar movement in India and later fled to Japan to continue his revolutionary activities.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: Barindra Kumar Ghosh was associated with the Jugantar revolutionary group in Bengal and the Alipore Bomb Case, not with the Ghadar Party.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee was a revolutionary from Bengal but had no documented association with the Ghadar Party.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: Rash Behari Bose was a key figure in the Ghadar movement, coordinating revolutionary activities in India and later becoming a prominent leader in Japan.
📝 Short Notes: Ghadar Party and Revolutionary Movements
| Revolutionary Movement | Key Personalities | Region/Base | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ghadar Party (1913) | Lala Hardayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna, Kartar Singh Sarabha, Rash Behari Bose | USA, Canada (overseas Indians) | Aimed to overthrow British rule through armed rebellion; Ghadar Mutiny (1915) |
| Jugantar (1906) | Barindra Kumar Ghosh, Bagha Jatin, Aurobindo Ghosh | Bengal | Revolutionary activities, Alipore Bomb Case (1908) |
| Anushilan Samiti | Pramathanath Mitra, Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee | Bengal | Revolutionary training, armed resistance |
- Rash Behari Bose: Mastermind of Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy (1912), attempted assassination of Lord Hardinge; coordinated Ghadar movement in Punjab and Bengal; later fled to Japan and helped form the Indian National Army.
- Barindra Kumar Ghosh: Younger brother of Aurobindo Ghosh; founder of Jugantar weekly; involved in Alipore Bomb Case; later turned spiritual.
- Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee: Member of Anushilan Samiti; involved in Bengal revolutionary activities; no direct connection to Ghadar Party.
Who among the following is associated with ‘Songs from Prison’, a translation of ancient Indian religious lyrics in English?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi translated a collection of ancient Indian religious lyrics from Sanskrit and other Indian languages into English during his imprisonment in Yerwada Jail in 1930. This work was published in London in 1934 under the title 'Songs from Prison'.
Why other options are incorrect:
Bal Gangadhar Tilak: He is well-known for his work 'Gita Rahasya', which he wrote while imprisoned in Mandalay (1908-1914), and 'The Arctic Home in the Vedas'. He is not associated with 'Songs from Prison'.
Jawaharlal Nehru: His major literary contributions include 'The Discovery of India' and 'Glimpses of World History', both written during his various terms in prison, but not 'Songs from Prison'.
Sarojini Naidu: Known as the 'Nightingale of India', she was a prolific poet whose works include 'The Golden Threshold', 'The Bird of Time', and 'The Broken Wing', but she is not associated with the translation 'Songs from Prison'.
📝 Short Notes: Prison Literature by Freedom Fighters
| Leader | Literary Work | Prison/Year | Subject |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahatma Gandhi | Songs from Prison | Yerwada Jail, 1930 | Translation of ancient Indian religious lyrics |
| Bal Gangadhar Tilak | Gita Rahasya | Mandalay Prison, 1908-1914 | Commentary on Bhagavad Gita |
| Jawaharlal Nehru | Discovery of India | Ahmednagar Fort, 1942-1946 | Indian history and culture |
| Jawaharlal Nehru | Glimpses of World History | Various prisons, 1930-1933 | Letters to daughter on world history |
| Vinayak Damodar Savarkar | Kamala; First War of Independence 1857 | Cellular Jail, Andaman | Poetry and history |
Consider the following statements:
- The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 recommended granting voting rights to all the women above the age 21.
- The Government of India Act of 1935 gave women reserved seats in legislature.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — 2 only
The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 introduced limited electoral reforms but did not grant universal voting rights to all women above the age of 21. The Government of India Act of 1935, however, explicitly provided reserved seats for women in both provincial and central legislatures, marking a significant step towards women's political representation.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms did not recommend granting voting rights to all women above 21; voting rights remained restricted based on property, income, and education qualifications.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: The Government of India Act of 1935 introduced reserved seats for women in provincial and central legislatures to ensure their political representation.
📝 Short Notes: Constitutional Reforms (1919-1935)
| Feature | Government of India Act, 1919 | Government of India Act, 1935 |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Reforms | Extended franchise on restricted basis (property, income, education); no universal women's suffrage | Reserved seats for women in provincial and central legislatures |
| Provincial Administration | Introduced Dyarchy (Transferred & Reserved subjects) | Abolished Dyarchy; introduced Provincial Autonomy |
| Central Legislature | Bicameral legislature established | Federal structure proposed (never implemented) |
| Subjects Division | Central and Provincial lists | Federal, Provincial, and Concurrent lists |
| Communal Representation | Separate electorates continued | Extended to more communities including women |
| Judicial Aspect | - | Established Federal Court of India |
Who among the following was associated as Secretary with Hindu Female School which later came to be known as Bethune Female School?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar
Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar served as Secretary of the Hindu Female School (established in 1849), which was later renamed Bethune Female School in honor of its founder J.E.D. Bethune. Vidyasagar played a crucial role in promoting women's education in Bengal and was instrumental in the administration and development of this pioneering institution for female higher education in India.
📝 Short Notes: Social Reformers and Women's Education
| Reformer | Key Contributions to Women's Education & Social Reform |
|---|---|
| Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar | • Secretary of Hindu Female School (later Bethune Female School, 1849) • Advocated widow remarriage leading to Hindu Widow Remarriage Act, 1856 • Promoted girls' education and opened schools for women • Opposed Kulin polygamy and child marriage |
| Annie Besant | • Founded Central Hindu College, Benares (1898), foundation for BHU • Established Central Hindu School for Girls, Varanasi • First woman President of INC (1917, Calcutta session) • Founded All-India Home Rule League with Tilak (1916) |
| Debendranath Tagore | • Founded Tattvabodhini Sabha (1839) • Led Adi Brahmo Samaj • Promoted rationalism and social reform through Brahmo movement |
| Sarojini Naidu | • First Indian woman President of INC (1925, Kanpur session) • Led Salt Satyagraha (1930) chosen by Gandhi • Accompanied Gandhi to Second Round Table Conference (1931) • Awarded Kaisar-i-Hind Medal for plague epidemic service |
With reference to Madanapalle of Andhra Pradesh, which one of the following statements is correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — Rabindranath Tagore translated the National Anthem from Bengali to English here.
Madanapalle in Andhra Pradesh holds a unique place in Indian history as the location where Rabindranath Tagore translated 'Jana Gana Mana' from Bengali to English. During his stay at the Besant Theosophical College in Madanapalle in February 1919, Tagore rendered the translation titled "The Morning Song of India."
❌ Option 1 – Incorrect: Pingali Venkayya designed the tricolour Indian National Flag but presented it to Mahatma Gandhi at the INC session in Bezwada (now Vijayawada), not Madanapalle.
❌ Option 2 – Incorrect: Pattabhi Sitaramaiah was a prominent leader in Andhra Pradesh and served as Congress President, but he did not lead the Quit India Movement from Madanapalle.
✅ Option 3 – Correct: Rabindranath Tagore translated Jana Gana Mana from Bengali to English as "The Morning Song of India" during his stay at Madanapalle in 1919.
❌ Option 4 – Incorrect: The Theosophical Society was founded in New York (1875) and moved its international headquarters to Adyar, Chennai (1882), not Madanapalle.
📝 Short Notes: Jana Gana Mana and National Symbols
- Composition: Jana Gana Mana was originally composed in Bengali by Rabindranath Tagore in 1911.
- First Performance: It was first sung at the Calcutta Session of the Indian National Congress on December 27, 1911.
- English Translation: Tagore translated it to English as "The Morning Song of India" at Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh in February 1919.
- Adoption as National Anthem: The Constituent Assembly adopted Jana Gana Mana as India's National Anthem on January 24, 1950.
- Duration: The full version has five stanzas; the official playing time of the shortened version is approximately 52 seconds.
- Nobel Prize: Rabindranath Tagore was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1913, becoming the first non-European to receive this honor.
In the first quarter of the seventeenth century, in which of the following was/were the factory/factories of the English East India Company located?
- Broach
- Chicacole
- Trichinopoly
Select the correct answer using the codes given below
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — 1 Only
This question tests knowledge of the early English East India Company factories established in the first quarter of the 17th century (1600-1625). Of the three locations mentioned, only Broach had an operational English factory during this period.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Broach (Bharuch, Gujarat) was established as an English factory in 1616-1617, soon after the establishment of the Surat factory (1613), making it one of the early trading posts on the western coast.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: Chicacole (Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh) was not an English factory in the first quarter of the 17th century; the English presence on the eastern coast was primarily at Masulipatnam (established 1611).
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: Trichinopoly (Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu) did not have an English factory in the early 17th century; it gained strategic importance only during the mid-18th century Carnatic Wars between the English and French.
📝 Short Notes: Early English East India Company Factories (17th Century)
| Period | Factory/Location | Year Established | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Quarter (1600-1625) | Surat | 1613 | First permanent English factory in India; gateway to Mughal trade |
| Masulipatnam | 1611 | First English factory on the eastern coast; textile trade center | |
| Ahmedabad | 1618 | Important textile manufacturing center | |
| Broach (Bharuch) | 1616-1617 | Western coast factory; trade in textiles and indigo | |
| Second Quarter (1625-1650) | Armagon | 1626 | First factory in south-eastern coast (near present-day Chennai) |
| Balasore | 1633 | Eastern coast; access to Bengal trade | |
| Fort St. George (Madras) | 1639 | Major fortified settlement on the Coromandel Coast | |
| Later (Post-1650) | Hooghly/Calcutta | 1651/1690 | Access to Bengal; Fort William established 1696 |
With reference to 8th August 1942 in Indian history, which one of the following statements is correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — The Quit India Resolution was adopted by the AICC.
On 8th August 1942, the All India Congress Committee (AICC) passed the historic Quit India Resolution at Bombay, launching the Quit India Movement under Mahatma Gandhi's leadership. This marked a decisive phase in India's freedom struggle, demanding immediate British withdrawal from India.
✅ Option 1 – Correct: The Quit India Resolution was indeed adopted by the AICC on 8th August 1942 at Bombay (now Mumbai).
❌ Option 2 – Incorrect: The expansion of the Viceroy's Executive Council was part of the August Offer of 1940, not related to 8th August 1942.
❌ Option 3 – Incorrect: Congress ministries resigned in seven provinces in October-November 1939 following the outbreak of World War II, not in 1942.
❌ Option 4 – Incorrect: Cripps Mission proposing Dominion Status occurred in March 1942, not on 8th August 1942.
📝 Short Notes: Quit India Movement (1942)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Date | 8th August 1942 (Resolution adopted) |
| Place | Bombay (Gowalia Tank Maidan) |
| Leader | Mahatma Gandhi |
| Slogan | "Do or Die" (Karenge ya Marenge) |
| Key Demand | Immediate end to British rule in India |
| Government Response | Immediate arrest of top Congress leaders on 9th August 1942 |
| Character | Spontaneous mass movement with widespread violence and sabotage |
| Parallel Governments | Established in Ballia (UP), Satara (Maharashtra), Midnapore (Bengal) |
In the context of Colonial India, Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Kumar Sehgal, and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon are remembered as
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — Officers of the Indian National Army
Shah Nawaz Khan, Prem Kumar Sehgal, and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon were senior officers of the Indian National Army (INA), also known as the Azad Hind Fauj, led by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. They are famously remembered for the historic Red Fort Trials (INA Trials) of 1945-46, where they were court-martialed by the British for 'waging war against the King-Emperor'. The trials sparked massive nationalist demonstrations across India and became a turning point in India's freedom struggle, with the Indian National Congress organizing an INA Defence Committee comprising legal luminaries like Bhulabhai Desai, Tej Bahadur Sapru, and Jawaharlal Nehru to defend them.
📝 Short Notes: Red Fort Trials and INA
- Indian National Army (INA): Formed in 1942 by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose from Indian prisoners of war and expatriates in Southeast Asia to fight British rule.
- Red Fort Trials (November 1945 - May 1946): Court-martial of INA officers at Red Fort, Delhi. The first trial featured three officers representing different communities - Shah Nawaz Khan (Muslim), Prem Kumar Sehgal (Hindu), and Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon (Sikh).
- Charges: Waging war against the King-Emperor, murder, and abetment of murder.
- Public Response: Massive demonstrations, strikes, and protests across India; united Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs in nationalist fervor.
- Defence Committee: Led by Bhulabhai Desai; included Tej Bahadur Sapru, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Kailash Nath Katju.
- Outcome: All three were sentenced to deportation for life, but the Commander-in-Chief remitted the sentences due to public pressure. The trials accelerated British decision to leave India.
- Legacy: The INA trials demonstrated that the British could no longer rely on Indian armed forces' loyalty and significantly contributed to the independence movement.