UPSC CSE Prelims
Subsidiary Alliance Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Practice solved questions for Subsidiary Alliance with detailed step-by-step solutions, key insights, and trend analysis for UPSC CSE PRELIMS.
Solved Previous Year Questions
Filter & practice questions topic-wise
Which one of the following statements does not apply to the system of Subsidiary Alliance introduced by Lord Wellesley?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — To secure a fixed income for the Company
The Subsidiary Alliance was a military-political system introduced by Lord Wellesley (1798–1805) to expand British control over Indian princely states through strategic alliances rather than direct land revenue administration. Securing a fixed income for the Company was the primary objective of land revenue systems like the Permanent Settlement (1793) introduced by Lord Cornwallis, not the Subsidiary Alliance.
✅ Option 1 – Applies: Indian rulers had to maintain a British force in their territory and pay subsidies for it, enabling the Company to maintain a large standing army at the expense of Indian states.
❌ Option 2 – Does Not Apply: The Subsidiary Alliance focused on military and diplomatic control, not on securing fixed land revenue income for the Company.
✅ Option 3 – Applies: The system required Indian rulers to expel all French officials and troops from their territories, protecting India from Napoleonic French influence during the European wars.
✅ Option 4 – Applies: By controlling external relations, defense, and stationing British Residents at royal courts, the Company established British paramountcy over Indian states.
📝 Short Notes: Subsidiary Alliance System
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Introduced By | Lord Wellesley (Governor-General, 1798–1805) |
| Primary Objective | Expand British control through indirect military and diplomatic means |
| Key Features | • Indian ruler had to maintain British troops and pay subsidy • British Resident stationed at the court • Ruler could not employ non-British Europeans • Ruler could not engage in foreign relations without British approval • British provided protection from external threats |
| First State to Accept | Hyderabad (1798) |
| Major States Under Alliance | Hyderabad, Mysore (after 1799), Awadh, Peshwa, Bhonsle, Sindhia, Jodhpur, Jaipur, Macheri, Berar |
| States that Resisted | Travancore initially resisted but later accepted |
| Difference from Permanent Settlement | Subsidiary Alliance: military-diplomatic control Permanent Settlement: land revenue system for fixed income |
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
Related Topics in Modern History
Government of India Acts
Committees and Commissions under British Rule
Swadeshi and Boycott Movement
Literary and Cultural Renaissance
English East India Company
Permanent Settlement, Ryotwari and Mahalwari
Commercialization of Agriculture
Social Reformers and Women's Issues
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Subsidiary Alliance in UPSC CSE PRELIMS