UPSC CSE Prelims
Parliamentary Procedures Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Practice solved questions for Parliamentary Procedures with detailed step-by-step solutions, key insights, and trend analysis for UPSC CSE PRELIMS.
Solved Previous Year Questions
Filter & practice questions topic-wise
Consider the following statements in respect of questions asked by the Members in the Parliament of India :
- Unstarred questions are those to which a Member desires an oral answer in the House.
- Starred questions are those to which a Member desires a written answer.
- No supplementary question can be asked on an unstarred question.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct ?
Detailed Explanation:
Statement 1 — Incorrect. Unstarred questions require a written answer — NOT oral. The written reply is deemed to be laid on the Table of the House by the concerned Minister.
Statement 2 — Incorrect. Starred questions (marked with *) require an oral answer on the floor of the House — NOT written.
Statement 3 — Correct. Since unstarred questions are answered in writing, no supplementary (follow-up) questions can be asked on them. Supplementary questions can only be asked after oral replies to:
- Starred questions
- Short Notice Questions
Quick Reference Table:
| Type | Answer Mode | Supplementary Allowed? |
|---|---|---|
| ⭐ Starred Question | Oral on floor of House | ✅ Yes |
| Unstarred Question | Written (laid on Table) | ❌ No |
| Short Notice Question | Oral | ✅ Yes |
Key Trick: Statements 1 and 2 are exact swaps of each other — a classic UPSC reversal trap.
With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:
- A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution.
- A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
- A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — 1 and 2
When the Lok Sabha is dissolved, bills pending in the Lok Sabha and bills passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha automatically lapse. However, a bill in respect of which the President has notified his intention to summon a joint sitting does not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, as the joint sitting mechanism continues to remain valid.
✅ Statement 1 (Bill pending in Lok Sabha) – Correct: A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses automatically upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha as the dissolution terminates all pending legislative business in that House.
✅ Statement 2 (Bill passed by Lok Sabha, pending in Rajya Sabha) – Correct: A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha also lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, as it is considered a bill originating from the Lok Sabha.
❌ Statement 3 (Bill notified for joint sitting) – Incorrect: A bill in respect of which the President has notified his intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting does not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha and can be taken up in the joint sitting after the new Lok Sabha is constituted.
📝 Short Notes: Lapsing of Bills in Parliament
- Bills pending in Lok Sabha: All bills pending in the Lok Sabha lapse upon its dissolution, except those already passed and sent to the Rajya Sabha or those pending President's assent.
- Bills passed by Lok Sabha: Bills passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
- Bills pending in Rajya Sabha only: Bills originating and pending only in the Rajya Sabha do not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, as the Rajya Sabha is a permanent House.
- Bills notified for joint sitting: Bills in respect of which the President has notified his intention to summon a joint sitting do not lapse and can be taken up in the joint sitting after reconstitution of the Lok Sabha.
- Bills pending President's assent: Bills that have been passed by both Houses and are pending the President's assent do not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
- Constitutional Bills: Bills pending at any stage, including constitutional amendment bills, follow the same lapsing rules as ordinary bills.
- Rajya Sabha as permanent House: The Rajya Sabha is a permanent body and is never dissolved, hence bills originating and remaining only in it do not lapse due to Lok Sabha's dissolution.
| Type of Bill | Stage | Effect of Lok Sabha Dissolution |
|---|---|---|
| Bill pending in Lok Sabha | Any stage in Lok Sabha | Lapses |
| Bill passed by Lok Sabha | Pending in Rajya Sabha | Lapses |
| Bill originating in Rajya Sabha | Pending only in Rajya Sabha | Does not lapse |
| Bill passed by both Houses | Pending President's assent | Does not lapse |
| Bill notified for joint sitting | After President's notification | Does not lapse |
| Bill returned by President | Pending reconsideration in Lok Sabha | Lapses |
The Parliament of India exercises control over the functions of the Council of Ministers through -
- Adjournment motion
- Question hour
- Supplementary questions
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — 1, 2 and 3
The Parliament of India exercises control over the Council of Ministers through multiple mechanisms to ensure executive accountability. All three instruments mentioned—Adjournment Motion, Question Hour, and Supplementary Questions—are important parliamentary tools for scrutinizing and controlling the executive.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Adjournment Motion allows discussion on urgent matters of public importance and can be used to censure the government, thereby exercising control over the Council of Ministers.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Question Hour is a daily mechanism during which MPs question ministers on policies and administrative actions, ensuring accountability and transparency in governance.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: Supplementary Questions follow the initial answer during Question Hour, allowing MPs to probe deeper and seek clarifications, thereby enhancing parliamentary control over ministerial functioning.
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
- A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
- A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — 2 only
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: A bill pending in the Lok Sabha does not lapse on prorogation. Prorogation is merely the end of a parliamentary session, not the dissolution of the House. All pending bills, motions, and other business remain intact and continue in the next session from where they were left.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha is a permanent body (never dissolved), so bills originating or pending there continue regardless of Lok Sabha dissolution. Only bills pending in the Lok Sabha itself lapse upon its dissolution.
Consider the following statements regarding a No-Confidence Motion in India:
- There is no mention of a No-Confidence Motion in the Constitution of India.
- A Motion of No-Confidence can be introduced in the Lok Sabha only.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: The Constitution of India does not explicitly mention the No-Confidence Motion; it is provided under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: A No-Confidence Motion can be moved only in the Lok Sabha (not in Rajya Sabha) as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha under Article 75(3). Requires support of at least 50 members to be admitted.
In the Parliament of India, the purpose of an adjournment motion is:
Detailed Explanation:
Adjournment Motion is an extraordinary parliamentary device used in the Lok Sabha only (not in Rajya Sabha) to discuss a definite matter of urgent public importance. It interrupts the normal business of the House and is considered a tool of censure against the government, requiring support of at least 50 members for admission.
❌ Option 2 – Incorrect: Question Hour and other devices are used for collecting information from ministers, not adjournment motion.
❌ Option 3 – Incorrect: This describes Cut Motion, which is used to reduce specific amounts in demand for grants during Budget discussion.
❌ Option 4 – Incorrect: This describes Adjournment of the House, a power exercised by the Presiding Officer to suspend sitting due to disorder or lack of quorum, not a motion moved by members.
Related Topics in Indian Polity
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Parliamentary Procedures in UPSC CSE PRELIMS