UPSC CSE Prelims
Budget and Financial Procedures Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Practice solved questions for Budget and Financial Procedures with detailed step-by-step solutions, key insights, and trend analysis for UPSC CSE PRELIMS.
Solved Previous Year Questions
Filter & practice questions topic-wise
With reference to Union Budget, consider the following statements :
- The Union Finance Minister on behalf of the President lays the Annual Financial Statement before both the Houses of Parliament.
- At the Union level, no demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — Both 1 and 2
Both statements are correct regarding the Union Budget. The Constitution of India mandates that the President causes the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before Parliament, which is done in practice by the Union Finance Minister. Additionally, no demand for a grant can be made at the Union level without the recommendation of the President, ensuring executive control over public expenditure.
✅ Statement 1 (Presentation of Budget) – Correct: Under Article 112, the President causes the Annual Financial Statement (Union Budget) to be laid before both Houses of Parliament, which is presented in practice by the Union Finance Minister on behalf of the President.
✅ Statement 2 (Demand for Grants) – Correct: Article 113(3) explicitly provides that no demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President of India, ensuring executive control over expenditure proposals from the Consolidated Fund of India.
📝 Short Notes: Union Budget and Financial Procedure
- Annual Financial Statement (Article 112): The President causes the Annual Financial Statement (Union Budget) to be laid before both Houses of Parliament for each financial year, showing estimated receipts and expenditure.
- Contents of Budget: The Budget distinguishes expenditure as (a) charged on the Consolidated Fund of India (non-votable), and (b) made from the Consolidated Fund of India (votable by Parliament).
- Demand for Grants (Article 113): Expenditure from the Consolidated Fund requires parliamentary approval through demands for grants. No such demand can be made without the President's recommendation.
- Appropriation Bill (Article 114): After grants are voted, the Appropriation Bill is introduced to authorize the withdrawal of money from the Consolidated Fund to meet the approved expenditure.
- Finance Bill (Article 110): A Money Bill containing provisions for taxation and other financial matters is introduced to give effect to the financial proposals of the government.
- Vote on Account (Article 116): Parliament can make an advance grant for a part of the financial year pending the voting of the main budget demands.
- Guillotine: A procedural device where all remaining demands for grants are put to vote simultaneously on the last day allotted for discussion, ensuring budget passage within the stipulated time.
| Constitutional Provision | Article | Purpose | Parliamentary Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Financial Statement | Article 112 | Presentation of Budget estimates | Discussion (no voting) |
| Demand for Grants | Article 113 | Approval of expenditure | Voting required (on President's recommendation) |
| Appropriation Bill | Article 114 | Authorization to withdraw funds | Voting required |
| Finance Bill | Article 110 | Implementation of tax proposals | Voting required (Money Bill) |
| Vote on Account | Article 116 | Advance grant for part of year | Voting required |
| Charged Expenditure | Article 112(3) | Non-votable statutory payments | Discussion only (no voting) |
Which of the following statements are correct in respect of a Money Bill in the Parliament?
- Article 109 mentions special procedure in respect of Money Bills.
- A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
- The Rajya Sabha can either approve the Bill or suggest changes but cannot reject it.
- Amendments to a Money Bill suggested by the Rajya Sabha have to be accepted by the Lok Sabha.
Select the answer using the code given below :
Detailed Explanation:
Correct Answer: Option 3 (1, 2 and 3)
A Money Bill deals only with matters listed under Article 110 of the Constitution, such as taxation, borrowing, and expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India. It can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha, and the Rajya Sabha has limited powers regarding it.
✅ Statement 1 is Correct: Article 109 provides the special procedure for passing a Money Bill.
✅ Statement 2 is Correct: A Money Bill cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States).
✅ Statement 3 is Correct: Rajya Sabha can only recommend changes within 14 days; it cannot reject a Money Bill.
❌ Statement 4 is Incorrect: Lok Sabha is not bound to accept the recommendations made by Rajya Sabha.
Short Notes: Money Bill
-
Article 110 defines a Money Bill.
-
A Money Bill can be introduced only in Lok Sabha.
-
Prior recommendation of the President is required before introduction.
-
The Speaker of Lok Sabha certifies whether a Bill is a Money Bill.
-
Rajya Sabha can only make recommendations and must return it within 14 days.
-
Lok Sabha may accept or reject Rajya Sabha's recommendations.
-
If Rajya Sabha does not return the Bill within 14 days, it is deemed passed.
-
There is no provision for a joint sitting in case of a Money Bill.
With reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament consider the following statements:
- When the Lok Sabha transmits Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill.
- When the Lok Sabha transmits Money Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it cannot amend or reject the Bill, it can only make recommendations.
- In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, there is no joint sitting for Money Bill, but a joint sitting becomes necessary for Finance Bill.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — Only two
This question tests the understanding of parliamentary procedures for Finance Bills and Money Bills. Out of the three statements, two are correct (Statements 1 and 2), while Statement 3 is incorrect because joint sitting is not mandatory but discretionary for Finance Bills.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Finance Bill (Category I under Article 117) follows ordinary legislative procedure, so Rajya Sabha can amend or reject it.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Money Bill (Article 110) cannot be rejected or amended by Rajya Sabha; it can only make recommendations within 14 days.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: Joint sitting is not available for Money Bills (correct), but it is not "necessary" (mandatory) for Finance Bills—under Article 108, the President "may" summon a joint sitting at discretion.
📝 Short Notes: Finance Bill vs Money Bill
| Aspect | Money Bill (Article 110) | Finance Bill (Article 117) |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Only in Lok Sabha | Only in Lok Sabha |
| Rajya Sabha Powers | Cannot amend or reject; only recommend within 14 days | Can amend or reject (ordinary legislative procedure) |
| Joint Sitting | Not provided (Article 108 does not apply) | Permitted under Article 108 (discretionary, not mandatory) |
| President's Assent | Mandatory | Mandatory |
| Certification | Speaker certifies as Money Bill | No special certification required |
| Scope | Deals exclusively with matters under Article 110 (taxation, consolidated fund, etc.) | Contains provisions beyond Article 110; may include ordinary law provisions |
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
Regarding Money Bill, which of the following statements is not correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — A Money Bill is concerned with the appropriation of money out of the Contingency Fund of India.
This statement is incorrect because the Contingency Fund of India, established under Article 267, is at the disposal of the President to meet unforeseen expenditures. Withdrawals from this fund are not governed by a Money Bill but are later regularized through an Appropriation Bill passed by Parliament.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Article 110(1)(a) explicitly states that a Money Bill contains provisions relating to imposition, abolition, remission, alteration, or regulation of any tax.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Article 110(1)(c) provides that a Money Bill may include provisions regarding the custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the Contingency Fund of India.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: Appropriation of money from the Contingency Fund is not governed by a Money Bill; it is under the President's disposal and later regularized through an Appropriation Bill.
✅ Statement 4 – Correct: Article 110(1)(d) states that provisions regarding borrowing of money or giving of guarantees by the Government of India fall within the scope of a Money Bill.
📝 Short Notes: Money Bill (Article 110)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Provision | Article 110 of the Indian Constitution defines Money Bills |
| Scope (Article 110(1)) | (a) Imposition, abolition, remission, alteration, or regulation of any tax (b) Regulation of borrowing of money or giving of guarantees by Government of India (c) Custody of Consolidated Fund/Contingency Fund of India (d) Appropriation of moneys out of Consolidated Fund of India (e) Declaration of expenditure as charged on Consolidated Fund (f) Receipt of money on account of Consolidated Fund/Public Account (g) Any matter incidental to these matters |
| Certification | Speaker of Lok Sabha certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill or not (final and conclusive) |
| Introduction | Can only be introduced in Lok Sabha (not in Rajya Sabha) |
| Rajya Sabha's Role | Can only make recommendations within 14 days; Lok Sabha may accept or reject them |
| President's Assent | Required, but President cannot withhold assent (unlike ordinary bills) |
| Contingency Fund | Established under Article 267; at President's disposal for unforeseen expenditure; withdrawals regularized later by Appropriation Bill (not Money Bill) |
With reference to the Union Government consider the following statements.
- The Department of Revenue is responsible for the preparation of Union Budget that is presented to the parliament
- No amount can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India without the authorization of Parliament of India.
- All the disbursements made from Public Account also need Authorization from the Parliament of India.
Which of the following statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The Department of Economic Affairs (under Ministry of Finance), not the Department of Revenue, prepares the Union Budget presented to Parliament.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Article 114 of the Constitution mandates that no money can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India without parliamentary authorization through the Appropriation Act.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: Public Account transactions (provident funds, judicial deposits, remittances) are operated by executive action and do not require parliamentary appropriation, functioning like banking transactions.
Consider the following statements:
- The Rajya Sabha has no power either to reject or to amend a Money Bill.
- The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on the Demands for Grants.
- The Rajya Sabha cannot discuss the Annual Financial Statement.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Under Article 109, the Rajya Sabha cannot reject or amend a Money Bill; it can only return it with recommendations within 14 days, which the Lok Sabha may accept or reject.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on Demands for Grants as per Article 113; this is the exclusive privilege of the Lok Sabha.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: The Rajya Sabha can discuss the Annual Financial Statement (Budget) under Article 112, though it cannot vote on the demands for grants.
Which of the following are the methods of Parliamentary control over public finance in India?
- Placing Annual Financial Statement before the Parliament
- Withdrawal of money from Consolidated Fund of India only after passing the Appropriation Bill
- Provisions of supplementary grants and vote-on-account
- A periodic or at least a mid-year review of the programme of the Government against macroeconomic forecasts and expenditure by a Parliamentary Budget Office
- Introducing Finance Bill in the Parliament
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Article 112 mandates placing the Annual Financial Statement (Budget) before Parliament, enabling financial scrutiny and control.
✅ Statement 2 – Correct: Article 114 requires Appropriation Bill passage before any withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India, ensuring Parliamentary authorization.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: Supplementary grants (Article 115) and vote-on-account (Article 116) provide mechanisms for Parliament to control additional or interim expenditure.
❌ Statement 4 – Incorrect: India does not have a Parliamentary Budget Office for mid-year macroeconomic reviews; such institutional mechanisms are absent.
✅ Statement 5 – Correct: Finance Bill (Article 110) introduction in Parliament is mandatory for taxation proposals, enabling control over revenue measures.
Related Topics in Indian Polity
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Budget and Financial Procedures in UPSC CSE PRELIMS