With reference to the "Tea Board" in India, consider the following statements:
- The Tea Board is a statutory body.
- It is a regulatory body attached to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
- The Tea Board's Head Office is situated in Bengaluru.
- The Board has overseas offices at Dubai and Moscow.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — 1 and 4
This question tests knowledge about the Tea Board of India's constitutional status, administrative control, and organizational structure. Statements 1 and 4 are correct, while statements 2 and 3 contain factual errors regarding its ministry affiliation and headquarters location.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: The Tea Board of India is a statutory body established under the Tea Act, 1953 to regulate the tea industry and promote tea exports.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: The Tea Board functions under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, not the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: The Tea Board's Head Office is located in Kolkata, West Bengal, not Bengaluru.
✅ Statement 4 – Correct: The Tea Board maintains overseas offices in Dubai, Moscow, Hamburg, London, and New York to promote Indian tea globally.
📝 Short Notes: Tea Board of India
- Establishment: Statutory body constituted under the Tea Act, 1953
- Administrative Control: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India
- Headquarters: Kolkata, West Bengal
- Regional Offices: Seven regional offices across major tea-growing areas in India
- Overseas Offices: Dubai, Moscow, Hamburg, London, and New York
- Main Functions: Regulation of tea cultivation, processing, trade; promotion of tea exports; quality control; research and development; welfare of tea workers
- Composition: Chairman and members representing tea producers, manufacturers, traders, consumers, and government
Question 5 of 6 Statutory Bodies
Practice PYQ questions from this topic across all years
Consider the following organizations/bodies in India: The National Commission for...
Consider the following statements The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 replaced...