Which one of the following best describes the 'Crowding Out Effect' in the context of fiscal policy ?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — Government borrowing raises interest rates, reducing private investment
Simple Explanation:
Option A — Wrong. This describes the opposite concept — "Crowding In Effect." It happens during a recession when govt spending boosts confidence and increases private investment too.
Option B — Correct. Crowding Out works like this:
- Govt runs a deficit → borrows heavily from the market
- More borrowers compete for the same pool of money (loanable funds)
- This pushes interest rates up
- Higher interest rates make loans expensive for private businesses
- So private investment goes down — it gets "crowded out"
Option C — Wrong. Higher taxes mean less money in people's pockets → less spending/investment, not more.
Option D — Wrong. Govt spending does add to demand. Crowding out just means the net effect is smaller than expected (because private investment drops), not zero.
Memory Trick: Govt borrows too much → interest rates rise → private players get "pushed out" (crowded out) of the loan market, like a small car getting squeezed out by a big truck in traffic.
Question 1 of 10 Fiscal Deficit, Revenue Deficit and Public Debt
Practice PYQ questions from this topic across all years
First question in this topic
A country’s fiscal deficit stands at ₹50,000 crores. It is receiving ₹10,000 cr...