Which of the following conclusions is/are valid?
- Though SARS-CoV-2 and HMPV are similar viruses with somewhat different epidemiology, the former became a pandemic because it was novel and people had not been exposed to it in the past.
- The two viruses have fundamentally different impacts on human populations and should not therefore be dealt with in a similar manner. Select the answer using the code given below.
Share
•
Correct Answer: Option B
Detailed Explanation:
The passage states HMPV and SARS-CoV-2 belong to "two very different virus families with fundamentally different characteristics and epidemiology."
- Statement 1 is Invalid: Calling them "similar viruses" directly contradicts the passage's assertion of fundamental differences.
- Statement 2 is Valid: The passage confirms different characteristics, epidemiology, severity, affected populations, and long-term impacts—supporting that they should not be dealt with similarly.
- Therefore, only Statement 2 is valid, making Option 2 the correct answer.
Question 1 of 2 Assumption & Argument
Practice PYQ questions from this topic across all years
First Question
First question in this topic
Next Question
2026
paper 2
Which of the following conclusions are correct? In the breakaway phase, economic p...
← Previous Question
•
→ Next Question