Which of the following conclusions are valid?
- Sport is more than just games; it is a way of life.
- Sport can help mitigate the problems of seclusion among the young.
- Earning laurels in sport can help one secure a job on the basis of an assigned quota.
- Standard corporate sector skills cannot be learnt through sport.
Select the answer using the code given below.
Detailed Explanation:
The passage explicitly states sport should be "seen as a way of life" (validates Statement 1) and that sport can "help tackle" problems of youth being "inactive and rarely leaving the house" (validates Statement 2, addressing seclusion).
The opening line acknowledges "getting jobs through a sports quota" as a reality of sport, even though it emphasizes sport offers more than this alone (validates Statement 3). However, the passage lists "time management, teamwork, coordination" as learnings from sport—these are standard corporate skills—so Statement 4 (claiming these cannot be learnt through sport) directly contradicts the passage and is invalid.
Therefore, statements 1, 2, and 3 are valid conclusions, making Option 4 the correct answer.
Question 2 of 13 Inference & Conclusion
Practice PYQ questions from this topic across all years
Which of the following conclusions are valid? Seven Sanskriti Angans, representing...
Which of the following assumptions is/are valid? Deflation strategies can be used...