UPSC CSE Prelims
Taxation System Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Practice solved questions for Taxation System with detailed step-by-step solutions, key insights, and trend analysis for UPSC CSE PRELIMS.
Solved Previous Year Questions
Filter & practice questions topic-wise
Consider the following:
- Demographic performance
- Forest and ecology
- Governance reforms
- Stable government
- Tax and fiscal efforts
For the horizontal tax devolution, the Fifteenth Finance Commission used how many of the above as criteria other than population, area and income distance?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — Only three
The Fifteenth Finance Commission used six criteria for horizontal tax devolution: Income Distance (45%), Population (15%), Area (15%), Forest and Ecology (10%), Demographic Performance (12.5%), and Tax and Fiscal Efforts (2.5%). Apart from the three mentioned criteria (population, area, and income distance), only three from the given list were used: Demographic Performance, Forest and Ecology, and Tax and Fiscal Efforts. Governance reforms and stable government were not used as criteria for horizontal tax devolution.
📝 Short Notes: Fifteenth Finance Commission - Horizontal Devolution Criteria
| Criterion | Weight (%) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Income Distance | 45% | Distance of state's per capita income from the highest income state |
| Population | 15% | Based on 2011 Census data |
| Area | 15% | Higher cost of service delivery in larger areas |
| Forest and Ecology | 10% | Share of dense forest cover; environmental conservation incentive |
| Demographic Performance | 12.5% | Rewards states for controlling population growth (1971 baseline) |
| Tax and Fiscal Efforts | 2.5% | Incentive for higher tax collection efficiency |
- Period: 2021-2026 (Award Period)
- Key Change: Demographic Performance replaced 'Demographic Change' used by 14th FC
- Not Included: Governance reforms, stable government, or political stability
Which one of the following effects of creation of black money in India has been the main cause of worry to the Government of India?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — Loss of revenue to the State Exchequer due to tax evasion.
The primary concern of the Government of India regarding black money is the substantial loss of tax revenue, which directly impacts the state exchequer's ability to fund essential public services, infrastructure development, and welfare programs. While other effects like investment in real estate, unproductive assets, or political donations are concerning, the most critical impact is the erosion of the fiscal capacity of the government due to systematic tax evasion. Black money, by its very nature, represents untaxed income that deprives the state of resources needed for national development and governance.
📝 Short Notes: Black Money and Its Economic Impact
- Black Money Definition: Income earned through illegal means or legal means but not reported to tax authorities to avoid taxation.
- Primary Government Concern: Revenue loss through tax evasion directly weakens fiscal capacity to fund public expenditure.
- Secondary Effects: Includes distortion of resource allocation, inflation in asset markets (real estate, gold), and undermining formal economy.
- Government Measures: Demonetization (2016), Income Declaration Schemes, Benami Transactions Act, Black Money Act (2015), and international cooperation through treaties.
- Economic Impact: Reduces GDP accuracy, creates parallel economy, increases income inequality, and hampers planned development.
- Estimation Challenges: Difficult to quantify precisely; various studies estimate black economy at 20-40% of GDP historically.
With reference to India's decision to levy an equalization tax of 6% on online advertisement services offered by non-resident entities, which of the following statements is/are correct?
- It is introduced as a part of the Income Tax Act.
- Non-resident entities that offer advertisement services in India can claim a tax credit in their home country under the "Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements".
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — None
Both statements regarding India's equalization tax of 6% on online advertisement services are incorrect.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The equalization levy was introduced under the Finance Act, 2016 as a separate tax, not as a part of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: Since the equalization levy is not classified as an income tax but as a separate levy on specified transactions, non-resident entities cannot claim tax credit in their home country under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs), which typically apply only to income tax.
📝 Short Notes: Equalization Levy
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Finance Act, 2016 (effective from June 1, 2016) |
| Legal Framework | Separate tax levy, not part of Income Tax Act, 1961 |
| Initial Rate & Scope | 6% on online advertisement services and related services by non-resident entities |
| Expansion (2020) | 2% levy on e-commerce transactions exceeding ₹2 crore annually |
| Threshold | Applicable when annual payment exceeds ₹1 lakh (for advertisement services) |
| DTAA Applicability | No tax credit available under DTAAs as it is not an income tax |
| Objective | Tax digital economy transactions where service provider has no permanent establishment in India |
| Recent Development | 6% levy on online advertisements abolished from April 1, 2025 |
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
The term ‘Base Erosion and profit shifting’ is sometimes seen in the news in the context of
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 2 — curbing of the tax evasion by multinational companies
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) refers to tax planning strategies used by multinational companies to artificially shift profits from higher-tax jurisdictions to lower-tax jurisdictions, thereby eroding the tax base of countries where actual economic activity occurs. The OECD/G20 BEPS Project aims to curb such tax avoidance practices through international cooperation and common standards. Governments worldwide have adopted BEPS measures to prevent multinationals from exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules across different countries, ensuring fair taxation where value is created.
A decrease in tax to GDP ratio of a country indicates which of the following?
- Slowing economic growth rates
- Less equitable distribution of national income
Choose the correct code:
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: A decrease in tax-to-GDP ratio often indicates slowing economic growth, as lower incomes and profits reduce tax collections, or reflects economic contraction where tax revenues fall faster than GDP.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: The tax-to-GDP ratio measures government revenue collection efficiency, not income distribution equity. A decreasing ratio could occur with progressive tax cuts benefiting all income groups, or with regressive taxes declining – it provides no direct information about income inequality or distribution patterns.
Related Topics in Indian Economy
Fiscal Deficit, Revenue Deficit and Public Debt
Fiscal Policy
Direct and Indirect Taxes
Government Budget
GST
Financial Sector Regulations and Institutions
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Taxation System in UPSC CSE PRELIMS