UPSC CSE Prelims
President Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Practice solved questions for President with detailed step-by-step solutions, key insights, and trend analysis for UPSC CSE PRELIMS.
Solved Previous Year Questions
Filter & practice questions topic-wise
With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements:
I. An Ordinance can amend any Central Act.
II. An Ordinance can abridge a Fundamental Right.
III. An Ordinance can come into effect from a back date.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement I is Correct: An Ordinance has the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament. Therefore, it can amend, repeal, or modify any Central Act, subject to constitutional limits.
❌ Statement II is Incorrect: An Ordinance cannot abridge or take away Fundamental Rights. Article 13(2) prohibits the State from making any law that violates Fundamental Rights.
✅ Statement III is Correct: An Ordinance can be given retrospective effect (back date), just like a law passed by Parliament.
Therefore, Statements I and III are correct.
📝 Short Notes: Ordinance
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Provision | Article 123 (President), Article 213 (Governor) |
| When Issued | When Legislature is not in session |
| Force | Same as an Act of Legislature |
| Approval | Must be approved within 6 weeks of reassembly |
| Limitation | Cannot violate Fundamental Rights |
| Retrospective Effect | Allowed |
Key Fact:
The Supreme Court has held that Ordinance-making power is a legislative power, but it is subject to judicial review.
Consider the following statements with regard to pardoning power of the President of India:
I. The exercise of this power by the President can be subjected to limited judicial review.
II. The President can exercise this power without the advice of the Council of Ministers.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
The President's pardoning power (Article 72) is not absolute. The Supreme Court can review its exercise in limited situations such as mala fide intent, arbitrariness, or consideration of irrelevant facts.
However, the President cannot exercise this power independently. Under Article 74, the President acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
Why the statements are correct/incorrect:
| Statement | Status | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| I | ✅ Correct | Pardoning power is subject to limited judicial review. |
| II | ❌ Incorrect | President exercises this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers. |
📝 Short Notes: Pardoning Power of the President
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Provision | Article 72 |
| Authority | President of India |
| Acts On | Aid and advice of Council of Ministers |
| Judicial Review | Allowed in limited cases |
| Types of Clemency | Pardon, Reprieve, Respite, Remission, Commutation |
Key Fact:
The President can grant pardon in cases involving court-martial, Union laws, and death sentences.
Consider the following statements in respect of election to the President of India:
- The members nominated to either House of the Parliament or the Legislative Assemblies of States are also eligible to be included in the Electoral College.
- Higher the number of elective Assembly seats, higher is the value of vote of each MLA of that State.
- The value of vote of each MLA of Madhya Pradesh is greater than that of Kerala.
- The value of vote of each MLA of Puducherry is higher than that of Arunachal Pradesh because the ratio of total population to total number of elective seats in Puducherry is greater as compared to Arunachal Pradesh
How many of the above statements are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 1 — Only one
Out of the four statements regarding the election of the President of India, only Statement 4 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect because nominated members are not part of the electoral college. Statement 2 is incorrect because a higher number of assembly seats actually reduces the value of each MLA's vote (as it is in the denominator). Statement 3 is incorrect because Kerala MLAs have a higher vote value (152) than Madhya Pradesh MLAs (131).
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The electoral college for Presidential election consists only of elected members of Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies; nominated members are not eligible to vote.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: The value of an MLA's vote = (Population of State ÷ Number of elected MLAs) ÷ 1000. A higher number of elective seats in the denominator actually decreases the vote value, not increases it.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: Based on 1971 Census, the vote value of each MLA of Madhya Pradesh is 131, while that of Kerala is 152. Therefore, Kerala MLAs have higher vote value than Madhya Pradesh MLAs.
✅ Statement 4 – Correct: The vote value of each MLA of Puducherry (16) is indeed higher than that of Arunachal Pradesh (8) because Puducherry has a greater ratio of population to elected seats.
📝 Short Notes: Presidential Election - Electoral College
- Composition of Electoral College (Article 54): Elected members of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, and State Legislative Assemblies (including NCT of Delhi and Puducherry). Nominated members and members of Legislative Councils are excluded.
- Value of MLA's Vote: Formula = (Total Population of State as per 1971 Census ÷ Total number of elected MLAs) ÷ 1000
- Value of MP's Vote: Formula = (Total value of votes of all MLAs of all States ÷ Total number of elected MPs in both Houses)
- Nature of Election: Indirect election through proportional representation by means of single transferable vote
- Key Exclusions: Nominated MPs and MLAs, MLCs, and currently J&K Union Territory
| State/UT | Vote Value per MLA (Examples) |
|---|---|
| Uttar Pradesh | 208 (Highest) |
| Kerala | 152 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 131 |
| Puducherry | 16 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 8 |
| Sikkim | 7 (Lowest) |
🧐 Not Sure What to Study Next?
Get a personalised study plan based on your goals, time and revision needs.
Consider the following statements:
- If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court of India, all acts done by him/her in the performance of duties of his/her office of President before the date of decision become invalid.
- Election for the post of the President of India can be postponed on the ground that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved and elections are yet to take place.
- When a Bill is presented to the President of India, the Constitution prescribes time limits within which he/she has to declare his/her assent.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 4 — None
All three statements are incorrect. Statement 1 wrongly suggests that acts done by the President whose election is declared void become invalid—they remain valid. Statement 2 incorrectly claims that dissolution of Legislative Assemblies can postpone Presidential elections—the Supreme Court has ruled otherwise. Statement 3 falsely asserts that the Constitution prescribes time limits for Presidential assent—no such time limit exists.
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: Article 71(2) specifically provides that if the election of a person as President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him/her before the date of such declaration are not invalidated and continue to remain in force.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: The Supreme Court in 1974 held that the dissolution of a state legislative assembly would not be a ground for preventing the holding of the Presidential election on the expiry of the President's term, nor can it be grounds for postponement until state assembly elections are held.
❌ Statement 3 – Incorrect: The Constitution of India does not prescribe any time limit within which the President has to decide concerning a bill presented for his/her assent. The President can keep bills pending indefinitely (pocket veto).
📝 Short Notes: Presidential Powers and Elections
| Aspect | Constitutional Provision |
|---|---|
| Validity of Presidential Acts | Article 71(2) - Acts performed before election being declared void remain valid |
| Presidential Election Timeline | Cannot be postponed due to dissolved state assemblies (SC 1974 ruling) |
| Presidential Assent | No time limit prescribed; President can exercise pocket veto |
| Presidential Assent Options | 1. Give assent to the Bill 2. Withhold assent to the Bill 3. Return the Bill (except Money Bill) for reconsideration 4. Keep pending indefinitely (pocket veto) |
| Exception | When a Bill is returned and passed again by Parliament, President must give assent |
With reference to the election of the President of India, consider the following statements:
- The value of the vote of each MLA varies from State to State.
- The value of the vote of MPs of the Lok Sabha is more than the value of the vote of MPs of the Rajya Sabha.
Which of the following statements given above is/are Correct?
Detailed Explanation:
Answer: Option 3 — 1 only
The value of the vote of each MLA varies from State to State because it is calculated based on the population of the state divided by the number of elected MLAs in that state. However, all MPs (both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) have equal voting value in Presidential elections, making Statement 2 incorrect.
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: The value of an MLA's vote is calculated as (Population of State ÷ Number of MLAs ÷ 1000), which varies across states based on population and assembly strength.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: All MPs have equal voting value in Presidential elections; the value is the same for both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members.
📝 Short Notes: Election of the President of India
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Method of Election | Indirect election through Electoral College consisting of elected members of Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies (Article 54) |
| Value of MLA's Vote | Formula: (Population of State ÷ Total number of elected MLAs ÷ 1000) Varies from state to state based on population and assembly strength |
| Value of MP's Vote | Formula: (Total value of votes of all MLAs ÷ Total number of elected MPs) Same for both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members |
| System of Voting | Single transferable vote system with proportional representation (Article 55) |
| Electoral College | Only elected members participate; nominated members of Parliament and State Assemblies cannot vote |
Consider the following statements:
- The Executive Power of the Union of India is vested in the Prime Minister.
- The Prime Minister is the ex officio Chairman of the Civil Services Board.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
❌ Statement 1 – Incorrect: The executive power of the Union is vested in the President of India under Article 53, not in the Prime Minister. The President exercises this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: There is no constitutional position called the Civil Services Board at the Union level, and the Prime Minister is not its ex officio Chairman. The Cabinet Secretary is the administrative head of the civil services.
Consider the following statements:
- The President shall make rules for the more convenient transaction of the business of the Government of India, and for the allocation among Ministers of the said business.
- All executive actions of the Government of India shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the Prime Minister.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Article 77(3) empowers the President to make rules for transaction of Government business and allocation among Ministers. These are known as the Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: Article 77(1) states all executive actions of the Government of India shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the President, not the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister heads the Council of Ministers but executive authority is formally vested in the President.
According to the Constitution of India, it is the duty of the President of India to cause to be laid before the Parliament which of the following?
- The Recommendations of the Union Finance Commission
- The Report of the Public Accounts Committee
- The Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General
- The Report of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
Detailed Explanation:
✅ Statement 1 – Correct: Article 281 mandates the President to lay the Finance Commission's recommendations before Parliament along with an explanatory memorandum.
❌ Statement 2 – Incorrect: The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a Parliamentary Committee that examines CAG reports and presents its own report to Parliament; the President does not lay PAC reports.
✅ Statement 3 – Correct: Article 151 requires the President to cause the CAG's reports relating to Union accounts to be laid before each House of Parliament.
✅ Statement 4 – Correct: Article 338(5) requires the President to lay the annual report of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes before Parliament with an action taken memorandum.
Related Topics in Indian Polity
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about President in UPSC CSE PRELIMS