Mr. X, a senior officer, was overseeing a critical vaccination programme during a pandemic. He found that a private service provider responsible for vaccine distribution was compromising on quality to make profits. Despite immense pressure to manage the issue due to vested interests, he raised his voice based on the principles of public administration which he learnt during various training programmes attended across his career. He reported the issue to the appropriate vigilance authority and halted the contract to ensure citizen welfare.
Which one among the following principles of public administration was most strongly demonstrated by Mr. X's actions?
Detailed Explanation:
Why Accountability is correct: Accountability is the obligation of public officials to take responsibility for their actions, ensure transparency, and answer to oversight bodies. Mr. X demonstrated this by:
- Reporting compromised vaccine quality to the vigilance authority
- Halting the contract despite immense pressure from vested interests
- Prioritising citizen welfare over convenience and pressure
Why other options are wrong:
| Option | Principle | Why Not Applicable Here |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esprit de corps | Team spirit/unity among personnel — not relevant to reporting misconduct |
| 2 | Equity | Fairness in distribution — his act was about taking responsibility, not fairness |
| 4 | Delegation | Transfer of authority — Mr. X was holding the delegated party accountable, not delegating |
Key Distinction: Accountability ≠ Whistleblowing alone. It is a proactive obligation to report, correct, and answer for public actions — especially when public health and funds are at stake.
Question 2 of 3 Administrative Dilemmas
Practice PYQ questions from this topic across all years
In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances...
Ms. X is a mid-level civil service official working in the urban development departme...