Detailed Explanation:

Answer: Option 1 — The power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders.

Judicial Review in India refers to the power of the Judiciary to examine and determine whether laws passed by the Legislature and actions taken by the Executive are in conformity with the Constitution. If any law or executive order is found to violate constitutional provisions, the courts can declare them invalid or unconstitutional. This power is derived from Articles 13, 32, 136, 142, and 226 of the Indian Constitution and forms a critical part of the system of checks and balances, ensuring the supremacy of the Constitution and protection of fundamental rights.

Why Option 1 is Correct:
Option 1 accurately defines Judicial Review as the judiciary's power to assess the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive actions, which is the core essence of this doctrine in India.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:
❌ Option 2 – Incorrect: The Judiciary cannot question the wisdom or policy behind laws; it can only examine their constitutional validity.
❌ Option 3 – Incorrect: Judicial Review is not a pre-enactment scrutiny mechanism; courts review laws only after they are enacted and challenged.
❌ Option 4 – Incorrect: This describes the power of review or reconsideration of judgments, not Judicial Review in the constitutional sense.