Detailed Explanation:

Answer: Option 1 — Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I

This question examines the nature of US Government debt and the implications of a potential default. Statement-II provides the fundamental reason for Statement-I: since US debt is backed only by the government's promise (full faith and credit) rather than tangible assets, bondholders have no hard assets to claim in case of default, making Statement-II a direct explanation of Statement-I.

✅ Statement-I – Correct: In the event of a US debt default, Treasury Bond holders would not be able to exercise their claims to receive payment because there would be no mechanism or assets available to satisfy those claims.

✅ Statement-II – Correct: US Government debt is indeed backed solely by the full faith and credit of the US Government, not by any physical or hard assets like gold reserves or property.

📝 Short Notes: Sovereign Debt and Fiat Currency Systems

• Fiat Money System: Modern economies operate on fiat currency systems where money and government debt are not backed by physical commodities (like gold) but by government decree and trust.
• Full Faith and Credit: US Treasury securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government, meaning the government's ability to tax and its commitment to honor obligations.
• Sovereign Default: When a government defaults on its debt, bondholders cannot seize government assets; they can only hope for future restructuring or partial payment.
• Legal Tender: The US Government has the sovereign power to print currency and levy taxes, which theoretically allows it to service debt, but this does not constitute "hard asset" backing.
• Difference from Asset-Backed Securities: Unlike corporate bonds or mortgages backed by specific assets, sovereign bonds rely purely on the issuer's creditworthiness and ability to generate revenue through taxation.